After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these kinds of systems. From lie recognition tools examined at the edge to a program for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being used in asylum applications. This article is exploring crisis telephone counseling how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to find their way these devices and to pursue their legal right for safety.
It also displays how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from being able to access the programs of cover. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, through which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article argues that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: whilst they aid to expedite the asylum method, they also produce it difficult for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.